Search for: "State v. K. T." Results 61 - 80 of 3,503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2013, 12:59 pm by Schachtman
My friend Chris Guzelian thinks that I have jumped the shark in joining with Professors Makuch and Lash in filing an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”] is similar to V (c), except that it refers to T 708/00 rather than to the Guidelines. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
It's time for another edition of "Fact or Fiction" a/k/a "Quick Answers to Quick Questions" a/k/a QATQQ f/k/a "I don't feel like writing a long blog post". [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
  It had to conclude that West Virginia wouldn’t follow Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A, comment k (1965). [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Welcome back to "Fact or Fiction" a/k/a "Quick Answers to Quick Questions" a/k/a QATQQ f/k/a "I don't feel like writing a long blog post". [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:49 pm by Utah Criminal Defense Blog
State of Utah v Gomez concerns a search and seizure case where the defendant was found guilty of possessing a variety of illegal drugs. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
For this reason alone, T 717/05 does not appear to be relevant. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
Welcome to the inaugural edition of "Fact or Fiction" a/k/a "Quick Answers to Quick Questions" a/k/a QATQQ f/k/a "I don't feel like writing a long blog post". [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:16 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550 (13 May 2011) AXA Sunlife Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 549 (12 May 2011) BDW Trading Ltd (t/a Barratt North London) v JM Rowe (Investments) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 548 (12 May 2011) AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) Kennedy v The Information Commissioner & Anor… [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
  The manufacturer could not “independently chang[e]” its product, “[t]hus, federal law prohibited [defendant] from taking the remedial action required to avoid liability under [state] law. [read post]