Search for: "State v. RW"
Results 61 - 80
of 103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2010, 3:18 pm
Moreover, the Department recognizes that while section 752(c) of the Act provides that the Department shall consider the weighted average dumping margins determined in the investigation and subsequent reviews, among other factors, the Act does not require the Department to rely on the weighted average dumping margins, or any particular weighted average dumping margin, as the basis for its determinations in five- year (sunset) reviews where such reliance would render the determination… [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 5:54 am
EcoDisc Technology AG v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:11 pm
467/08, Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE) had just been uploaded on to the Curia website. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
Westerfeld v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
United States Cellular Corporation (N.D. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:15 pm
Bard, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:51 pm
It is of the opinion that the reply to its questions will affect the resolution of the main proceedings, because it will determine whether the claimant in the main proceedings is entitled to claim fair compensation for private copying in respect of all the CD-Rs, CD-RWs, DVD-Rs and MP3 players marketed by the defendant, or only in respect of those digital reproduction devices and media which it may be presumed have been used for private copying. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:23 am
The IPKat thanks his good friend Natalie Nathon for drawing his attention to this morning's press release on Advocate General Trstenjak's Opinion (discussed here) in Case C-467/08 Sociedad General de Autores y Editores (SGAE) v Padawan S.L.. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:43 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Appleby, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 926 (29 April 2010) Jones, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 925 (29 April 2010) Kazantzis, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 712 (16 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RW v SW [2010] EWCA Civ 457 (29 April 2010) Birmingham City Council v Clue [2010] EWCA Civ 460 (29 April 2010) McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ B1 (29 April 2010) Parker v Secretary of… [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:56 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio ‘pay to play’ law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D California decision… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc… [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:42 pm
The case is Princo Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
And while previous decisions from continental courts, including the Cour de Cassation itself (Stolzenberg v Daimler Chrysler Canada, Cour de Cassation, 30 June 2004 [2005] Il Pr 24; see also in Belgium Civ Bruxelles, 18 December 1989, RW 1990-1991), had been opposed to the anti-suit injunction, the Cour de Cassation now seems to find the enforcement of a contractual anti-suit injunction entirely unproblematic. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 2:42 pm
Green v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 2:37 pm
The ICA, citing Pono v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:07 am
United States v. [read post]
