Search for: "Thomas v. United States Department of Agriculture" Results 61 - 80 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2013, 4:37 pm by Rick E. Rayl
United States, while the Court held that the property owner has the right to make a takings argument, the Court did NOT conclude that a taking had in fact occurred. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:36 am by Mike Scarcella
They also said a judgment against Nguema “will infringe Equatorial Guinea’s sovereign right to create, interpret, and enforce its own laws and will significantly hinder the existing cooperative, friendly relationship between the United States and Equatorial Guinea. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
Espy ("Espy"), the court affirmed the authority of the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") to regulate E. coli O157:H7 as an adulterant. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
 For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:57 am by Laurie Williams - Guest
Department of Agriculture (USDA) has authority to prevent “the introduction of plant pests into the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Department of Interior, 538 U.S. 803 (2003). [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
  He focuses on Justice Stevens' and Scalia's dissents in the dismissal of the certified question in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]