Search for: "US v. David Alexander"
Results 61 - 80
of 394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
Mark Mazzetti and David D. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:58 am
Alexander Bobikin and Alexander Ivanov, who listened to the verdict standing in a reinforced glass box at the Kotelevska district court in central Ukraine, both pleaded ‘guilty’ last week. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko said yesterday that Moscow wouldn’t stand idly by if Finland were to join NATO. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:18 am
David Stern and Hannah Knowles report for the Washington Post. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm
”The matter is really no different from what Chief Justice John Marshall said in Marbury v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:10 am
David A. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 11:33 am
Reynolds traced the influence of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 8:28 am
Which brings us back to Tutu. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Both of these efforts are a sign that the Trump era has left a heritage of “movement/countermovement interaction” within the institutions of American federalism -- to adopt the terminology of sociologists David Meyer and Suzanne Staggenborg. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:05 pm
For example, the case of Alexander v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
Smith (Emory), Alexander Volokh (Emory), Camilla E. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:37 am
Used under CC 2.0 license.]When the Arizona Supreme Court upheld the conviction on Miranda’s case, they found a decision by the US Supreme Court rendered shortly before Miranda’s case, in the matter of Escobedo v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
With respect to the earlier witnesses, the Justice Department explained that the extraordinary step of waiving any potential privilege claim was appropriate because the “question whether former President Trump sought to cause the Department to use its law enforcement and litigation authorities to advance his personal political interests with respect to the results of the 2020 presidential election” constituted an “exceptional circumstance” that justified departing… [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:02 am
How many apartments have been purchased and sold using the traditional contract, price, payment and transfer? [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 7:50 am
Sourabh Gupta examined the impact of South China Sea arbitration before the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea tribunal five years after its landmark decision in Philippines v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
That’s Alex Hamilton, not Alexander Hamilton. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
Coogan v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
In Collins v. [read post]
