Search for: "United States v. Chestnut" Results 61 - 80 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2020, 11:51 am by Danielle D'Onfro
Moreover, the city and its amici contend that the court has already determined that § 542(a) permits creditors to remain in possession of debtors’ property notwithstanding § 362 in the bankruptcy chestnut United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Molly Runkle
Addressing the first accusation, Maynard argued that the Sisters’ prophesying activity was protected by the First Amendment. (11th century Scottish law here looks remarkably similar to that of the 21st century United States.) [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 8:06 am
United Cerebral Palsy has put together a Resource Guide to help locate the needed assistance in Delaware. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
The opinion concludes by quoting Brandeis's hoary chestnut about states as laboratories of experiment, thus throwing the "federalism" gauntlet before, say, Anthony Kennedy, who often writes of the "dignity" of states and the necessity of federal courts to protect that dignity against those who would unduly limit state autonomy. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 99 AD3d 918, 925-926 [2012] [internal citations… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 99 AD3d 918, 925-926 [2012] [internal citations… [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:54 am by Schachtman
Richard Posner is a judge of the United States Court of Appeals, for the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:30 am by Michael Herz
United States, which rejected a nondelegation challenge to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:02 pm by azatty
In United States v. [read post]