Search for: "United States v. Frye"
Results 61 - 80
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2014, 5:06 am
United States, 66 A.3d 1013 (D.C. 2013) and Frye v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:58 am
Brown v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 7:48 am
Facts: This case (Frye v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
The Court concludes therefore that there is insufficient evidence to show general causation.Federal and State Courts have consistently determined that the cause or causes of MCS (IEI) cannot be reliably established by scientific proof (see, e.g., Oppenheimer v United Charities of NY, 266 AD2d 116, 698 NYS2d 144 [1st Dept 1999]; Frank v State of New York, 972 F Supp 130 [ND NY 1997]). [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:30 am
Now the law throughout the United States, California has recognized gay marriage since 2008 (though only by those married during the window before Proposition 8 was passed) and then again in 2013 when the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Perry v Hollingsworth overturning the Proposition 8 prohibition. [read post]
5 May 2007, 1:32 pm
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:29 pm
It’s called a Frye-Mack hearing in Minnesota based upon two reported cases that outlined the procedure; United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:41 am
The states and United States argue that, so long as the defendant has not been deprived a fair and reliable trial, there is no prejudice under Strickland. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:42 am
The case is similar to two recent Sixth Circuit cases that also concerned auto-deduct meal policies in the health care industry, Frye v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:20 am
Standards like Frye and Daubert v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:59 am
Frye v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert is now over 25 years old. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:23 pm
In Chambers the United States Supreme Court held that a state's evidentiary rule is trumped by and cannot preclude a defendant form introduce reliable evidence consistent with his right to present a defense. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:43 am
With the Court set to hear arguments this week in two of the Term’s most anticipated cases – United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
In fact, Lafler and Frye remind me of one of the Court decisions from that era, Henderson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:53 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (DC 1923)—or the foundation rule set by the state Court of Appeals in Parker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:08 pm
In Lafler v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:09 am
United States (293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
