Search for: "United States v. General Research Laboratories"
Results 61 - 80
of 333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 11:10 am
Honda as ". . .a comprehensive bill to promote the development and responsible stewardship of nanotechnology in the United States . . . . [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
KSR v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 10:33 am
At the DIDA site, under Document Sources, you can read about some of those drug company lawsuits, in particular: United States of America ex rel. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
Put another way, how much illness in the United States is caused by foodborne pathogens? [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 7:38 am
It is clear that the patent rights in this case have affected who can get tested, how testing is conducted in the United States, and who owns and controls the information that results from genetic tests. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 11:01 am
See, e.g., Sandra Shines v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:36 am
Based in Greenwich, Conn., the firm invests exclusively in healthcare companies in the United States, Canada and Western Europe. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Cuvler Hammond of the Environmental Sciences Laboratory of the Mt. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 7:26 am
And what does this say about innovation policy more generally? [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
The Court concludes therefore that there is insufficient evidence to show general causation.Federal and State Courts have consistently determined that the cause or causes of MCS (IEI) cannot be reliably established by scientific proof (see, e.g., Oppenheimer v United Charities of NY, 266 AD2d 116, 698 NYS2d 144 [1st Dept 1999]; Frank v State of New York, 972 F Supp 130 [ND NY 1997]). [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:39 am
Siracusano, and United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 9:40 pm
The co-authors also note that the context of the debate differs between Europe and the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:14 am
The United States Supreme Court issued a patent opinion this week in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:14 am
The United States Supreme Court issued a patent opinion this week in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:24 pm
Allen v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Lederle Laboratories, 656 P.2d 293, 297 (Or. 1982). [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 12:25 pm
Pom Wonderful had seven independent labs, including the "leading juice authenticity testing laboratory in the United States," conduct additional scientifically accepted tests specifically designed for pomegranates. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 9:43 am
In Pfizer v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
