Search for: "United States v. Government of Virgin Islands" Results 61 - 80 of 152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2016, 10:48 am by John Floyd
Attorneys in the U.S., Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands, and Mariana Islands about how these obligations must be fulfilled: Section 9-5.001 of the United States Attorneys Manual (USAM) and the Federal Criminal Discovery Blue Book (“Blue Book”). [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:07 am
Shannon, 766 F.3d 346 (3d Cir. 2014); Gov’t of Virgin Islands v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The government response was the enactment of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, which created the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and made financial reporting obligatory for public corporations. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 9:16 am by Lorraine McGowen
[1] Other U.S. territories include American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S Virgin Islands (U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm by nedaj
Advisers registered in other states should consult with legal counsel about those states’ custody requirements. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm by Cory J. Fox
Data Breach Notification A summary of H.B. 232’s data breach notification provisions, which generally mirror the statutes enacted in the other 46 states, as well as the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, is provided below. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
Supp. 386 (D.V.I. 1979), a federal district court held that defense attorneys in a highly publicized murder trial were public figures because they had come to the Virgin Islands from New York to represent the defendant for free, thus injecting themselves into the case, and held press conferences to generate support for their client. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
Supp. 386 (D.V.I. 1979), a federal district court held that defense attorneys in a highly publicized murder trial were public figures because they had come to the Virgin Islands from New York to represent the defendant for free, thus injecting themselves into the case, and held press conferences to generate support for their client. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
Supp. 386 (D.V.I. 1979), a federal district court held that defense attorneys in a highly publicized murder trial were public figures because they had come to the Virgin Islands from New York to represent the defendant for free, thus injecting themselves into the case, and held press conferences to generate support for their client. [read post]