Search for: "University Oral "
Results 61 - 80
of 6,704
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2024, 4:05 am
In her oral evidence to the House of Commons’ Culture, Media and Sport Committee last March, Dame Melanie stated that “the phrase ‘freedom of expression’ is a very important part of this debate – one that perhaps should be a little bit more prominent”. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:30 pm
The second, a virtual lecture and conversation with Alison LaCroix, University of Chicago Law School, draws upon her forthcoming book, The Interbellum Constitution: Union, Commerce, and Slavery in the Age of Federalisms and will take place at Noon (EST) on May 29.Columbia University's "Incite" project reimagines oral hist with its Oral History of the Obama Presidency, undertaken in partnership with the Obama Foundation. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:05 pm
I last attended oral arguments at the Supreme Court in the Trump v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:12 pm
During roughly 90 minutes of oral arguments, a majority of the justices appeared ready to throw out the dispute over the FDA’s expansion of access to the drug in 2016 and 2021 because the challengers in the case – several individual doctors and groups of doctors who are opposed to abortion on religious or moral grounds – do not have a legal right to sue, known as standing. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:37 am
“We've had...a rash of universal injunctions... [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:17 am
[Live commentary on the Supreme Court oral argument in FDA v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
If Corner Post obtains relief, that relief will be universal in a sense. [read post]
The Free Speech Trifecta: How the Court Could Fundamentally Alter Free Speech in Three Pending Cases
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
That is why these oral arguments had some alarming moments. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court then granted cert and oral argument is tomorrow. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Anderson bars states from enforcing Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment against presidential candidates, it does not prevent a state from adopting and enforcing, as a matter of state law, a bar to presidential ballots candidates who held past office and violated their oaths by engaging in insurrection.At oral argument, Chief Justice Roberts raised a related uniformity concern. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
David Boyd, UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and the Environment has recently summarized and reflected on th quite interesting case recently decided by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in Habitantes de La Oroya Vs. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am
House of Commons Home Affairs Committee: Oral evidence: Asylum decision-making and conversion to Christianity, HC 595. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:19 am
During oral argument in both cases, the justices appeared skeptical of both laws. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
It scheduled an almost immediate oral argument, which it held yesterday morning. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:08 am
Then, after a lengthy back and forth, TENNY was granted leave to appeal, and oral arguments were held on January 17 before the New York Court of Appeals. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm
During oral argum [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:24 am
More broadly—and here we come to precedents that were indeed raised in the Murthy oral argument—the Supreme Court held in Blum v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
The June 2022 remand led to oral argument before a three-judge Fourth Circuit panel in December 2022. [read post]
The Supreme Court Cannot Ignore the National Security Implications of the So-Called ‘Jawboning’ Case
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
” In a universe in which agencies like the FBI and DHS can be held responsible for “coercion” and “significant encouragement” simply by virtue of their status as law enforcement entities even where no threats of adverse action are made (and even where former social media company officials deny taking action due to coercion or significant encouragement as the Fifth Circuit defined it), it is understandable that these agencies would exercise extreme caution… [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
Another canard Stanford dispels relates to supposed statements by Renee DiResta, research manager at Stanford University (and a board member of Tech Policy Press). [read post]
