Search for: "Waterhouse v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2017, 3:18 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Although Title VII bars “sex stereotypes” insofar as that particular sort of “sex-based consideration” causes disparate treatment of men and women, Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 1:35 pm by Christopher Wilkinson
  The DOJ’s brief was clear that Title VII does not prohibit sexual orientation discrimination, and that “the EEOC is not speaking for the United States” and its position about the scope of Title VII is entitled to no deference. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 3:54 am by SHG
But isn’t the EEOC there to speak for the United States? [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This is particularly so given the Supreme Court’s holding in 1989 in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Except, on Friday, Judge Cathy Bissoon from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania concluded EEOC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
Innovators and their investors have long been vital to a flourishing innovation economy in the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:14 am by Kathy Kapusta
While the university argued that the Tenth Circuit, in Etsitty v. [read post]