Search for: "Worth v. Worth"
Results 61 - 80
of 21,046
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
Advanced Cell Diagnostics v Molecular Instruments [2024] EWHC 898 (Pat) On 23 April 2024, Mr Justice Meade handed down his judgment in the dispute between Advanced Cell Diagnostics (ACD) and Molecular Instruments (MI). [read post]
9 May 2024, 3:59 pm
In Bradford v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:44 am
The judgment is worth a close read by all insurance parties involved in cancellation insurance. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:37 am
It is worth thinking in this regard about how far we have come with regard to fiduciary prudence and the conduct of plan administrators. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
As anticipated, TikTok and ByteDance have initiated legal action against the U.S. government, challenging a recently enacted law that would ban TikTok unless ByteDance sells the company off in the next nine months to an entity not controlled by a foreign adversary. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
As anticipated, TikTok and ByteDance have initiated legal action against the U.S. government, challenging a recently enacted law that would ban TikTok unless ByteDance sells the company off in the next nine months to an entity not controlled by a foreign adversary. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
However, to paraphrase Justice Stephen Breyer, writing in Heffernan v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
., R. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:42 am
The case is Carlyle Aviation Partners LLC et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:49 am
” “During the investigation into one of those seven cases, Fields v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONB. v Structure Tone, Inc. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:00 am
No one was arguing in the Idaho case that EMTALA codifies Roe v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:32 am
Farro’s DCF Analysis and Reliance on the PE Projections In advance of the valuation hearing, Farro offered the expert opinion of a well-known business appraiser who concluded that as of the valuation date, Farro’s cashed-out 1/3 interest in LMEG was worth more than $24 million. [read post]
4 May 2024, 6:12 am
The style of this opinion is, Ashley and Walter Burke v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
Bungie, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 5:57 am
A recent example is found in the case of Morton v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am
Academics from Weizenbaum, European University Viadrina and SNV have also published their first impressions of compliance with Article 40(12) (definitely worth a read). [read post]
