Search for: "Cox v. Cox"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,842
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
CORE v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Wheaton Van Lines Inc. et al v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
Colleen V. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 1:54 pm
Cox (9th Cir. 2014) (so holding). [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
The claim says Cox failed to disconnect 200,000 repeat copyright infringers. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
A number of other complaints about infringements of his religious practices were dismissed.In Cox v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
<> Case Update: Michigan v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
The acquittal has been seen as a blow to the Crown Prosecution Service, which has been accused by defence counsel (and Tory MP) Geoffrey Cox QC of bringing “lunatic” charges against reporters. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Cox 14-531Issue: Whether this Court’s decision in Martinez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 1:14 pm
Case citation: Music Group Macao Commercial Offshore Limited et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:43 am
Cox, 2015 U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 9:32 am
Cox, 343 F.3d 1323, 1332 (11th Cir. 2003). [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:30 am
A public employee’s speech as a citizen rather than as an employee protected by the First AmendmentMatthews v City of New York, USCA, 2nd Circuit, Civ. 13-2915New York City Police Officer Craig Matthews sued the City of New York alleging that the City had retaliated against him for speaking to his commanding officers about an arrest quota policy at his precinct. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:34 am
If the COLOURBLIND case (Pangyrus Ltd v OHIM, RSVP Design Ltd, Case T-257/11) had been a movie, it would have secured a nomination for its intricate screenplay, in the spirit of the recent Academy Awards. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:15 pm
Cox 14-531Issue: Whether this Court’s decision in Martinez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
In his recent decision in the case of Heichel v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:58 am
The court also denied the plaintiff’s motion for class certification, finding his circumstances too unique to satisfy Rule 23 commonality and adequacy requirements (Cox v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
In his recent Opinion in the case of Young v. [read post]