Search for: "DOES 1-116"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2013, 12:10 pm
Q: What does it all mean? [read post]
19 May 2013, 5:01 pm
In view of the wording of A 116 the ED has no margin of discretion at all. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Moreover, the fact that it was very easy to check that the late-filed documents were quite suitable for establishing that a “dual-phase steel” as the one of D1 contained aluminium, that the OD had good reason to accept the documents E6 and E7 that had been filed after the time limit fixed pursuant to R 116(1) and to maintain the OPs and that it had no reason to postpone the OPs. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:54 pm
Conclusion While successful regulatory takings claims are still infrequent, there does appear to be a judicial shift towards reigning-in overreaching government regulations. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:43 pm
” Cranor 116. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
In this decision the Board had to delve into interpretative questions.Claim 1 of the main request on file read:A hermetically sealed, molded thermoplastic dispensing container which comprises:a nozzle (16, 116, 216) unitary with the container (10, 110, 210) and defining a dispensing aperture (18);a removable closure unitary with the nozzle (16, 116, 216) and occluding the aperture (18);said nozzle (16, 116, 216) being adapted to receive the hub (36) of a… [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
& Pol’y 89-116 (2012). [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 6:46 pm
The Domestic Relations Law provides two routes to adoption, Title II, Adoption from an Authorized Agency, sections 112 through 114; and Title III, Private–Placement Adoption, sections 115 and 116. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 5:40 am
Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 112 S.Ct. 773, 116 L.Ed.2d 903 (1992) prohibits voiding its junior security deed. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 4:40 am
Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 112 S.Ct. 773, 116 L.Ed.2d 903 (1992) prohibits voiding its junior security deed. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 6:57 am
Call that cluster 1. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:49 am
Although §256 is a general remedial statute,the district court correctly held that the record does notsupport “correcting” the named inventorship of the MGHpatents.The case would have to be decided by an interferenceproceeding. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 4:10 am
The fact that s. 14(1)(b) of the Code does not require intent by the publisher or proof of harm, or provide for any defences does not make it overbroad.... [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:01 am
Article 1 contains definitions for product, geographical and technology market. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
Center for Humanities, Inc., 518 U.S. 415, 427, 116 S.Ct. 2211, 135 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996); Burke, 605 F.Supp.2d at 651, n. 2 (M.D.Pa.2009). [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:17 am
In re Geisler, 116 F.3d 1465, 1469-70 (Fed. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Accordingly, A 116(1) foresees that OPs shall take place not only at the request of a party but also at the instance of the EPO if it considers this to be expedient. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 10:08 pm
This chapter makes for some interesting reading if you're interested in comparative labour law.What Responses Does the Report Recommend? [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 10:16 am
., 330 U.S. 1, 15 (1947). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:06 am
Fire Ins., 561 N.E.2d 116 (1990).2Doctor's Assocs., Inc. v. [read post]
