Search for: "GENERAL MOTORS CORP" Results 781 - 800 of 1,433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of Michigan:  People v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
– battle between designer ‘Hidden Eloise’ and Paperchase (Class 99)   United States US General Should USA black list itself on its Special 301 List? [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy IP)… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy IP)… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
– battle between designer ‘Hidden Eloise’ and Paperchase (Class 99)   United States US General Should USA black list itself on its Special 301 List? [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:56 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
General Motors Corp., a 1968 case in which a plaintiff suffered severe injuries when the steering column in his Chevrolet Corvair thrust backwards during a head-on collision, striking him in the head. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:43 pm by Javier Dominguez
Toyota Motor Corp. et al., case number 1:18-cv-22798, in the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 10:00 pm
Ford, GM Ask UAW To Administer Health Care Benefits Ford Motor and General Motors officially have asked the United Auto Workers to assume responsibility for the health care benefits of more than 1.5 million working and retired employees. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
A step behind: (Spicy IP),Proposals for ISPs to terminate infringers go (even more) global: (LawFont.com),Five ways to minimize risk of copyright liability from citizen media: (IP ADR Blog), Pharma & BiotechPharma & Biotech - GeneralMillennium Pharmaceuticals spent $1.28 million on lobbying for patent reform and biologics legislation in 2007: (Patent Docs),New Thai Minister may review compulsory licences on cancer drugs: (Intellectual Property Watch),… [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Everest Minerals Corp., 362 F. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:57 am by Brian A. Comer
Nissan Motor Corp., 77 F.3d 736, 738 (4th Cir. 1996), the court stated in dicta that the “ordinary consumer” standard for determining if a product is unreasonably dangerous does not necessarily apply in the case of products associated with allergic reactions in an appreciable number of consumers. (2) Products Consumed Over a Long Period of Time Comment j. also carves out an exception to the duty to warn if the potential danger of a product relates to its use over a long… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
Solicitor General’s office for advice on whether the Court should grant review. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:16 am
 See Kawasaki Motors Corp. v. [read post]