Search for: "In Re Penn" Results 781 - 800 of 1,496
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2012, 11:00 am by Karen Tani
Penn)3.15-4.15 Constituting late antique Muslim identities: The charity tax (Lena Salaymeh, UCB)4.30-5.30: Closing DiscussionMoreRead more » [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:00 am by Jurgen Kurtz
Supreme Court’s decision in Penn Central Transportation Co. v City of New York. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:47 pm by Rebecca Anderson
Part of each session is open to the university as a colloquium series that we’re co-sponsoring with Penn’s Center for East Asian Studies and the new Center for the Study of Contemporary China. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:33 am by Rebecca Anderson
Nearly 1,000 people from the Penn and Penn Law communities convened at Irvine Auditorium on April 5 for Golkin Hall’s dedication event, A Conversation with U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:20 pm
 Suppose you're an author looking to submit your article. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:11 am by Steven M. Gursten
Said Douglas Smith, MD, professor of Neurosurgery and director of the Center for Brain Injury and Repair at Penn’s Perelman School of Medicine, the study’s co-senior author: “A single traumatic brain injury is very serious, both initially, and as we’re now learning, even later in life. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:44 pm by admin
According to Joe Amendola, the criminal defense attorney for Sandusky, he intends to dispute her findings by calling on other psychologists to re-examine the files. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 6:08 am by admin
            The word “zealous” gets tossed around although we’re not talking about zealotry in the religious sense. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:43 am by Rebecca Anderson
  Professor Bibas sat down with Penn Law's Office of Communications to talk more about his book. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 9:00 am by Rebecca Anderson
Penn is a great place to integrate if you’re interested in policy and science development and neuroscience specifically,” he said. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 3:11 pm by Walter Olson
Penn Law case] Tags: Bay Area, broadcasters, campaign regulation, Eliot Spitzer, free speech, libel slander and defamation, Montana, police, trademarks Related posts March 2000 archives, part 2 (1) Archived media law & free speech items, pre-July 2003 (0) Update: Speechless in Seattle (1) Talk show subpoenaed in Boston mosque suit (0) Siccing the law on Fox News (1) [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:24 am by Steve Bainbridge
Here in the University of California system we're in an era of incredible financial constraints. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:15 am by Ken
Fortunately, Penn told them to piss off. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:59 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
But while critics may think plaintiffs are “making a fuss to get some money out of it,” Kennerly added, “that’s also what causes organizations to rethink what they’re doing. [read post]