Search for: "Prior v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 48,278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
The Court later defined prior restraint limits in the New York Times v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
X Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
It also found that the proxy statement failed to disclose the first advisor’s fees for prior work for members of Nordic’s equity consortium, which amounted to nearly $400 million in the relevant two-year period. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am
Finally, it’s hard not to conclude that the protracted history of prior litigations may have had an impact upon the decision. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:07 am
Marital Misconduct and Post-Separation Support This issue was one of a few legal points discussed in the appeals case of Evans v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:42 pm
VILER, Appellants, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
Last year, the state court ruled in favor of the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
General guidance on confidentiality: the Fujifilm v Kodak decision, LD Düsseldorf, UPC_CFI_355/2023, 27 March 2024 In these proceedings, the defence to infringement was based on a prior use argument deriving from an acquisition in 2017. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:43 pm
Our article on the same, “Hilltop Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 10:38 am
States cannot take real property without a prior hearing, but personal property is different because it could be hidden before a hearing takes place. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
Anticipation and obviousness Turning next to validity, MI’s main attack was on anticipation and/or lack of inventive step over the prior art “Collins” alone, or together with the prior art “Kern”, a citation in Collins. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
United States, and Shoop v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:23 pm
Petrella v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
S. 555 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:55 am
The Supreme Court is currently considering the meaning of “accrues” in the context of suing the United States government in Corner Post, Inc. v. [read post]
