Search for: "State v. Alexander"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,082
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In Texas v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:55 am
Evidence of Mr Gleissner's activities was relevant and admissible (as it was in the Alexander case). [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 11:02 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
”Ananda V. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 3:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:27 am
At the Huffington Post, Scottie Thomaston has coverage of an amicus brief filed recently by Indiana and fourteen other states in Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:29 am
Alexander, 359 N.C. 824 (2005). [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
, Irene BloemraadPart V Membership in the State and Beyond 25. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
To take just one example, while TCRR cites Alexander Polikoff’s Waiting for Gautreaux for the fact that 65 of the 75 staff attorneys in the Civil Rights Division protested the Justice Department’s change of position in Alexander v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
To take just one example, while TCRR cites Alexander Polikoff’s Waiting for Gautreaux for the fact that 65 of the 75 staff attorneys in the Civil Rights Division protested the Justice Department’s change of position in Alexander v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 4:59 am
It is so awarded.See: Danicek v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 4:32 pm
In Thome v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:59 am
U.S. combined) and noted jurisdiction in a third (Alexander v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
In Collins v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 3:05 am
” [Alexander v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 8:12 pm
Alexander, 391 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2004). [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 6:33 am
Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. [read post]
