Search for: "State v. D. U." Results 781 - 800 of 2,471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Claimants will be allowed to prove that:(i) SPDC was involved in bribing the witnesses [U], [V], [II], [YY], [KK], [LL], [MM] and [NN] because [a.] [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kantrowitz, Go/dliamer & Graifman, P.C., 121 A.D.3d 775, 776, 994 N.Y.S.2d 171 (2″d Dept. 2014); see Lawrence Ripak Co., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
A few months ago, we wrote about precisely such a case, Rosin v Schnitzler, 2018 NY Slip Op 32320(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County Sept. 4, 2018], in which Commercial Division Justice Lawrence S. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm by Richard Hunt
Louisiana Tech U., 2019 WL 1303212, at *7 (W.D. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, the rules of one Ohio court categorically call for such injunctions in divorce cases: In all cases, upon the filing of the initial Complaint for divorce, annulment or legal separation, both spouses shall be restrained from … [u]sing the Internet … for the purpose of posting … electronically written words, images and/or videos which threaten, harass or defame and/or slander the other spouse …. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
[u]sing the Internet ... for the purpose of posting ... electronically written words, images and/or videos which threaten, harass or defame and/or slander the other spouse .... [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
At The National Law Review, Brian Pierson looks at the court’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm by Patricia Hughes
It provides a shield for individuals from arbitrary state action. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
App. 2015); the Montana Legislature also enacted this version of the statute when the earlier, still broader, version was struck down in State v. [read post]