Search for: "State v. Kent" Results 781 - 800 of 1,638
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2014, 4:49 am by Amy Howe
    Briefly: At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses yesterday’s order directing Esteban Martinez to file a response to the state’s petition for rehearing in Martinez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Alice Woolley
And while occupying that role Robidoux violated the key ethical duties that lawyers owe: loyalty, confidentiality and candour (See, e.g., R. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
” Also last Thursday, in McCullen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:13 am by Dan Markel
(Rachel asked to also thank UVA law librarian Kent Olson for his help with the underlying research). -- In light of the likely significance of the Court's opinion in Riley v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
Medtonic, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) and Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:32 am by Jeremy
William Brutocao and Eric Bjorgum, lead trial attorney and team member in the case of the famed Los Angeles mural of Ed Ruscha by Kent Twitchell point out that “a mural is [a] piece of property comprising separate ownership rights of title, possession, copyright and moral rights”. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
” At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief, as well as the issues at stake more broadly, in next Term’s North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger asks why the Court’s decision in Plumhoff v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:18 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston explained the state of play for this blog; other coverage comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 8:31 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]