Search for: "State v. Mitchell" Results 781 - 800 of 1,835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Planned Parenthood has criticized the lawsuit stating that they are “furious but not surprised. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
Today’s live blog team comprises Emma Boffey, Rory Thomson, Shona McCusker, Sian McNiff, Kenneth Rose, Emma Cross, Will Anderson, Mitchell Abbott, Felicity Bramall and Jennifer Love, all from CMS. 16:01: Lady Hale thanks the parties for the swiftness of their submissions and notes that the Court will adjourn until 10.30am tomorrow. 16:00: Lord Keen QC rests his submissions. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:13 am by Fred Yarger
A plurality of the court, in the 2000 decision Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:42 am by Anthony Gaughan
As Justice Brennan noted in his concurring opinion in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:30 am by Michael Scutt
Ideally that selection criteria should be objective and non-discriminatory as possible, although previous case law (Mitchells of Lancaster (Brewers)Ltd v Tattersall) has held that using non-objective criteria is not fatal to a redundancy selection exercise, provided the criteria is used fairly. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because we find that Staunch was not an "eligible employee" under the FMLA and her state law claims are without merit, we AFFIRM the district court's grant of summary judgment to Continental. 08a0005p.06 Auletta v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:41 am by Stan Gibson and Jessica Newman
Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP is approved by the State Bar of California as a Minimum Continuing Legal Education (MCLE) provider. [read post]