Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 13,860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2014, 5:59 am
Concluding that it does, the court here found that the “common meaning of ‘employment related tests’ fits the FBI PFT like the proverbial glove. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
See also §1611(a), (b)(1), (b)(2). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:09 am
What does official data available online at http://tsc.gov.in say? [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:42 am
Code § 1028A(a)(1) was not supported by sufficient evidence. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 2:51 am
June 15, 2014 I am pleased to be a guest speaker at the Canadian Society of Association Executives’ (CSAE) National Conference 2014 in Niagara Falls this fall (October 29-31). [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 9:05 am
As a consequence, the Court continued, exhaustion of the distribution right under S 17 of German Copyright Law does not apply to digital files like audiobooks downloaded from the internet, even if their download is made with the consent of the rightholder and it amounts to a transfer of property. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:27 pm
The 29-member board did so on a 9-0 vote. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:39 pm
It does not apply to contracts that are subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts (such as Federal Highway Administration grants for road reconstruction or Housing and Urban Development-funded construction by local housing authorities). service contracts covered by the Service Contract Act (SCA). concessions contracts, including any concessions contract excluded from the SCA by the Department of Labor’s regulations at 29 CFR 4.133(b). [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
1. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
1. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
(relisted after the May 29 and June 5 Conferences) Brown v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:08 am
[Update: it was missing bacon, which, to be honest, does seem a lot worse.] [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 10:23 am
In particular, Allianz seeks to enforce a Judgment it obtained against Miller in the District Court of Zurich, Switzerland on March 29, 2010…. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 1:56 am
Firstly, it is not clear whether the proviso to section 45(3) – “unless otherwise expressly provided” – is met by section 29(1)(a). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:50 am
I have been considering current efforts to implement the U.N. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
There was a deep irony to the Goodman[1] case. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
Instead it follows its own method, but does not always satisfy state requirements. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:09 am
Alabama, 13-1138 (limited to Question 1). [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 2:33 am
Does this really mean anything? [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
This new act does two things: (1) it precludes litigation against intermediate sellers unless they either took some affirmative action with respect to the product, or the manufacturer for some reason can’t be sued; and (2) it creates a compliance presumption concerning federal safety standards. [read post]
