Search for: "Individual Does 1-10"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 14,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2015, 1:54 pm
The Mental Health Service Provider – Patient Privilege is a rule of evidence, and as such, does not carry direct penalties for breach of confidentiality. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:02 pm
The ECJ observed in this respect that one must ascertain, at the outset, whether the defendant could be considered to be bound to the company by an “individual contract of employment”. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:01 am
[iii] Iowa Code § 9H.1(8), (9), (10), (11). [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 2:46 am
Tied in with this are the start date (1 Jan 2018) and the end date (1 Jan 2021). [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am
The Marzzarella two-step test is as follows: 1. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 10:09 am
I want to talk about these on a high-level, and not get into the minutia of what does and doesn’t apply on an individual level. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
In the Grand Chamber proceedings, third-party comments were received from the Turkish Government, who had exercised its right to intervene in the case (Article 36 § 1 of the Convention). [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 7:20 pm
Although the study does not address VTCs, it does offer a deep analysis of the need for targeted treatment plans for veterans. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 7:24 am
Whetstone’s Proposed Counter Proposition of Law # 1 The purpose of punitive damages is not to compensate a plaintiff but to punish the guilty, deter future misconduct, and to demonstrate society’s disapproval. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:07 am
In FoodNet surveillance areas in 2008, the rate of Shigella was 6.6 per 100,000 population, exceeded only by Salmonella (15.2/100,000) and Campylobacter (12.7/100,000). [10] During 2006, public health officials reported a total of 1,270 foodborne-related outbreaks from 48 states in the U.S. [9] Although Shigella was responsible for only 10 (1%) of those outbreaks, 1 [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 1:32 pm
It does not appear to deal with actions against employers or workers; they are covered by s-s (1). [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:22 am
As of 1 October, 2015, the U.K. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 6:45 am
But perhaps most fundamentally, the FCC wants to make sure that an inadvertent bid, or one by an unauthorized individual, does not result in a broadcaster agreeing to surrender their channel and cease operations. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 6:32 pm
In general, because these expressive rights involve the use of personal data, it does seem reasonable to allow some form of user control over data use. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:01 pm
It is thought that HLA-B27 may affect the elimination of the infecting bacteria or an individual’s immune response. [1] HLA-B27 has been shown to be a predisposing factor in one-half to over two-thirds of individuals with reactive arthritis. [8,1] While HLA-B27 does not appear to predispose to the initial infection itself, it increases the risk of developing arthritis that is more likely to be severe and prolonged. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
(1) Series of decisions that were, I think, a wrong turn—that public figures couldn’t suffer privacy harm from use of images w/o permission. (2) Corporations wanted to take control for themselves of profitable control of individual identities. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
Co., No. 1:08–0909, 2010 WL 692842, at *1 (S.D.W.Va. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:58 am
This does not apply to: (1) animal rides (including pony, camel, and elephant rides); (2) milking booths; or (3) the petting of an animal held or restrained outside of its housing area by an exhibit operator or patron as part of an educational or photographic opportunity where there is limited possibility of contact with manure and bedding. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:26 am
This does not apply to: (1) animal rides (including pony, camel, and elephant rides); (2) milking booths; or (3) the petting of an animal held or restrained outside of its housing area by an exhibit operator or patron as part of an educational or photographic opportunity where there is limited possibility of contact with manure and bedding. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:19 am
Hastert was indicted in a scheme in which he paid more than $1.7 million to conceal unspecified past misconduct to someone only identified as “Individual A. [read post]
