Search for: "Does 1 through 12"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 15,573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
The worksheet had the date of 12 March 1997 and lists the date of application as 18 April 1996. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 12:00 am
Superior Court, ___ Cal.4th ___ (April 12, 2012) [Slip Opn., at 1, 4]. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 12:49 pm
App. 1 Cir. 9/12/11), 77 So.3d 39. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 9:56 am
Upon release from prison, he will be prohibited from driving for 12 years. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am
Most importantly, under the Court's approach, as under the existing accommodation, separate “contraceptive coverage [would] be obtained by petitioners’ employees through petitioners’ insurance companies,” Order at 1, and the insurer would make payments to the employees, dependents and/or students directly, not through the employer’s health plan. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
It is no more than a temporary solution, which does not address the foundational issues. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:29 am
The author of the article mentioned above mentions that the draft does not deal with indirect structures, designed to prevent the existing shareholder from exercising his rights, as illustrated by the Fosun/Shanghai Soho dispute. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
There are 36 possible Type 1 and 28 Type 2 violations. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 11:08 am
The rule does not apply to exporters who ship food through the United States (for example, from Canada to Mexico) by motor or rail vehicle if the food does not enter U.S. distribution. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 8:26 am
The Defendants each separately filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6), which the trial court granted. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:34 am
Acevedo, 627 F.2d 68, 69 n. 1 (7th Cir.1980); United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:50 pm
Since the Rule does not revoke existing EBSA fiduciary guidance or judicial precedent, service providers and other parties with discretionary authority or responsibility over employee benefit plans not covered by the Rule still could qualify as fiduciaries if their authority, responsibility or actions functionally causes them to fall within the definition of a fiduciary under these other pre-existing definitions of fiduciary status. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:50 pm
Since the Rule does not revoke existing EBSA fiduciary guidance or judicial precedent, service providers and other parties with discretionary authority or responsibility over employee benefit plans not covered by the Rule still could qualify as fiduciaries if their authority, responsibility or actions functionally causes them to fall within the definition of a fiduciary under these other pre-existing definitions of fiduciary status. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:18 am
Plaintiffs’ counsel spent a large part of his time going through the dates and details of all the filings in state and federal court, both before and after the Antoons retained counsel. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:45 pm
For the past 12 years, at least, an employee’s status as exempt or non-exempt under the FLSA has been determined by a test consisting of three elements: duties, salary basis and salary level. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 am
., MDL NO. 2342, 12-MD-2342, 2016 WL 1320799 (E.D. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:24 pm
The movement states that we are now the 99 percent struggling against the 1 percent. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:41 pm
Ether has dramatically increased in value, from $1 to $12, totaling about $1 billion in Ether that currently exists. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm
Bielawski’s employer, the University ofTexas, through an open records request and state courtlitigation. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:12 pm
A ‘qualifying non-resident employer’ is defined in the Proposed Amendments to mean an employer whom, (a) is resident in a country with which Canada has a tax treaty, (b) does not, in the relevant year, carry on business through a permanent establishment in Canada, and (c) is certified by the CRA by making an application in the prescribed form at least 30 days prior to the employee performing the services in Canada. [read post]
