Search for: "MRS v. State"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 21,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2015, 3:36 pm
In this episode, Mr. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:24 am
The test which has replaced it is whether a stated remedy in a contract is proportionate to the legitimate interests of the innocent party. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:11 am
On 27 October 2015 Mr Justice Blue, sitting at first instance in the Supreme Court of South Australia, handed down judgment on liability in the defamation case of Duffy v Google Inc ([2015] SASC 170). [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
On Monday this Kat posted "When litigants must be responsible -- and what happens when they're not: Lyrica pregabalin injunction is continued" (here), this being a short note on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat), in the Patents Court, England and Wales, to extend an interim injunction in an ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic version of… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:39 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 12:32 pm
(Slager v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:47 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 6:49 am
Facts: This case (Deflecto, LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:18 pm
In this episode, Mr. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
MR. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm
MR. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am
The New York Times writes that a confirmation of an attack on the plane “will only strengthen Mr. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:44 am
Bank v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical [2015] EWHC 2973 (Pat), decided on 22 October by Mr Justice Birss in the Patents Court, England and Wales, is a decidedly unbifurcated ruling, being a full-blooded infringement-and-invalidity action running to 243 paragraphs. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
How many states have done that? [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 10:30 pm
Mr. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm
United States The Panopticon blog reports on the argument in the US Supreme Court case of Spokeo Inc v Thomas Robins, a case which concerns the issue as to whether there should be compensation for “digital injury” where there is no financial loss. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 3:33 pm
Further, while child related benefits might be ‘designed to meet the needs of the child’ (R (SG and Others)) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [ 2015 ] UKSC 16 ), this could include the child’s housing costs. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 8:23 am
The style of the case is, Marcia Slack v. [read post]
