Search for: "State v Cooper"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 8,568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
“[A]nnually report[s] to Congress on cybersecurity threats and issues facing the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Google LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:23 pm
A similar approach (with different outcome) has been taken in Ribeiro v Wright, 2020 ONSC 1829, Court of Ontario, Canada. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
The purpose of this Convention is "to notify to other States where a launching State's space objects are located in order to prevent collision" and to make "identifiable the potentially liable launching State for damage cause by a space object. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
Springfield, IL 62704 Phone: (217) 782-9696 (V/TTY) Fax: (217) 524-5339 Web: http://www.state.il.usagency/ipcdd Down Syndrome Down Syndrome Development Counsel P.O. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of… [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 9:00 am
As a participating provider, you have an affirmative obligation to cooperate with the UPIC’s requests. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
It has given us unprecedented access to public affairs information—local, state, national, and international. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
For a sense of just how badly wrong Marc is about the scope of the First Amendment, consider the recent dismissal of the twitter-stalking case in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:50 pm
Interestingly, in Cugalj et al v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am
The respondents have stated in their application that the allegations made in the petition arise out of the Joint Venture Agreement (hereinafter referred to as JVA) dated January, 7, 1994 between the petitioner and the respondent, wherein under Article 11, the parties have agreed to refer and determine all claims, disputes, controversies, disagreements, all differences between the parties arising out of or in connection with the agreement by arbitration. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
The second was to establish an annual Forum on Business and Human Rights " to discuss trends and challenges in the implementation of the Guiding Principles and promote dialogue and cooperation on issues linked to business and human rights" (A/HRC/RES/17/4, ¶12). [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm
‘‘(v) NARROWEST POSSIBLE SCOPE OFEXCEPTION. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
Casenotes: state. [read post]
