Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 8121 - 8140
of 16,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2015, 4:44 am
Does the picture depict a counterfeit, however? [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 10:05 am
The text does not rule out any of these three views. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 1:25 pm
Garland, et al., No. 5:23-CV-034-H (N.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 9:48 am
The DSS safety plan does not hold the authority of law and does not give Mother (or DSS) the authority to circumvent an order of the family court. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 8:42 am
Does the job description indicate the position is full-time? [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 3:43 pm
Rule 12(h) Waiver or Presentation of Certain Defenses, “…does not mean that a party with information to make a motion for joinder can sit back and raise the issue at any time when the only effect would be to protect himself,” at p. 454. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:08 am
(H/T: On Point News) Earlier coverage: Dec. 2003. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:01 am
The analysis is a bit more challenging.Section 163(a) permits a deduction for all interest, but for individuals section 163(h)(1) disallows deductions for personal interest. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:25 pm
See H. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:03 am
Accordingly, we conclude that selecting an area having boundaries does not require defining the boundaries. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:18 pm
Proof of a prima facie case does not necessarily satisfy ACS's ultimate burden of proof; nor does it compel a finding in accordance with that inference. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:26 am
Does this plan require an audit? [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 8:12 am
" I wonder if Bach's B minor Mass would make the cut -- of course one would have to translate the title to Latin, or perhaps even French -- Messe en H-Molle meets this test too, I suppose. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:01 pm
h. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 3:14 pm
The plurality opinion comes closest to rejecting diversity as a compelling state interest in the final paragraph of IIIB, when it states "[h]owever closely related race-based assignments may be to achieving racial balance, that itself cannot be the goal, whether labeled "racial diversity" or anything else. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:56 pm
” Judge Preska was nominated by President George H. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 9:53 am
The statute does not define what constitutes a “reasonable request,” nor does it address an employer’s obligations, if any, with respect to positions that do not have a predetermined pay scale. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:37 am
Appendix to § 1630.2(h). [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:08 pm
(H/T Sarah Simmons!) [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:09 pm
& Health Care Ctr., Inc., 224 F3.d 701, 704 (7th Cir. 2000) (“[H]arassment based solely upon a person’s sexual preference or orientation (and not on one’s sex) is not an unlawful employment practice under Title VII. [read post]
