Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 8121 - 8140
of 15,525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2014, 1:53 pm
This past week, in Schuette v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 1:12 pm
., Wells v. [read post]
Copying is all that Samsung needs to do in order to work around four of Apple's five patents-in-suit
26 Apr 2014, 7:53 am
I was impressed by the iPhone sales figures Apple reported this week (though the iPad did not do too wel). [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 7:31 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:51 am
From Cortez v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:35 am
Just before Easter, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Phil & Ted's Most Excellent Buggy Company Limited v TFK Trends for Kids GmbH, EWCA Civ 469 (apologies for the slight delay in this blogpost – the abundance of bunnies over the Easter break briefly distracted this Kat from monitoring Court of Appeal decisions.) [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm
That is one of the more intriguing questions spawned by yesterday's decision in the child pornography case, Paroline v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
In this week’s case (Bulpitt v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:38 am
The figure they've come up with is 3.4 million. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:23 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court appeared skeptical of a due process challenge to revocation of a liquor license during the recent oral argument in WISAM 1, d/b/a Sheridan Liquors v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm
Now, with Navarette v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:14 am
The name of the case is Paroline v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:53 am
Smithsonian National Museum of American HistoryDr. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:55 am
., January 14, 2013, and the Court awarded supplemental damages of $79,550,288.00, a figure which represented the supplemental damages for the infringement until that date. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
Good luck figuring that out. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am
Feels a bit like giving in, though.Anyway: Transcript of oral argument, for those who prefer not to read secondhand postmortems.Supreme Court post-argument discussion at AU's Washington College of Law: Pom Wonderful v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:41 am
In Yemgas Fzco & Ors v Superior Pescadores S.A. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:19 pm
JANE DOE v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 1:19 pm
In the case of Huerta v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 7:25 am
This figure includes £4,000 general damages and £12,850 VAT, which will be due on the remedial costs. v) The defendant’s various counterclaims for damages are dismissed. vi) The defendant is not entitled to move the gas meter and gas pipe to their proposed new positions. [read post]
