Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 801 - 820
of 25,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2014, 11:23 am
* People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:44 am
This article offers some hypotheses (possibly paywalled): “When “Like”-Minded People Click: Facebook Interaction Conventions, the Meaning of “Speech” Online, and Bland v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 6:03 am
I’ve seen several versions of the claim that Justice Elena Kagan’s opinion in Chiafalo v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:28 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:00 pm
Schedule V drugs include mostly certain types of cough medicines. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:00 pm
Spencer v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:59 am
” Ex parte Seibold, 100 U.S. 371, 394-95 (1880). [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:51 am
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the upcoming argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 7:20 am
Does 1-22, without getting its "ex parte discovery order".We have learned of it dropping another "John Doe" case, this one in Greensboro, North Carolina, targeting students at NC State and UNC Charlotte, again without getting its "ex parte discovery order", BMG Music v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
Ramos v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:32 pm
” But sometimes Marks is difficult to apply; Baze v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:47 am
The cases was reversed in part and affirmed in part and remanded for further proceedings. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 8:16 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
Where the motion papers demonstrate that the defendant’s right to testify before the grand jury has not been “scrupulously protected,” the “mandatory language” of CPL § 190.50(5) “creates what is a ministerial duty on the part of the court to dismiss an indictment obtained in violation of a defendant’s right to appear before the Grand Jury” (Matter of Borrello v Balbach, 112 AD2d 1051 [2nd Dept 1985]; see also,… [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 12:25 pm
Facts: This case (United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
Sure, many people have come and gone from Dilworth Paxson before me over the years. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 7:47 am
Over at my Legal Blog Watch Beat, I posted about the Walmart v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 7:37 am
Today, I'll talk about the second case that people often rely on when they want to argue that there's a rule against private delegations: Carter v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
The purpose of this post, which will be three parts, is to note some of the key cases over the last twelve months or so in England and Wales. [read post]
