Search for: "Roll v. Roll"
Results 801 - 820
of 6,809
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2009, 1:31 pm
In today’s case (Shular v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:08 pm
By Stephanie Olson On May 19th, the Supreme Court resolved a circuit split in Petrella v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 10:33 am
The latest issue of the Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Vol. 70, no. 4, 2010) is out. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:30 pm
Again, I don't suspect that this committee is going to try to send a bill to the floor anytime soon but it is good to get the ball rolling on righting the wrong of Riegel v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:30 pm
Again, I don't suspect that this committee is going to try to send a bill to the floor anytime soon but it is good to get the ball rolling on righting the wrong of Riegel v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:52 am
The Court of Appeals decisions yesterday in the case of Foundations of East Chicago v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:43 pm
The standard was meant to repeal the agency's sweeping 2004 preemption rules, returning it to the so-called 'Barnett standard' established by the 1996 Supreme Court case of Barnett V. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 11:03 am
He appealed on the basis of the old law (Pudlish v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:57 am
Roll Call (subscription only) has an editorial by Simon Lazarus in which he argues that Congress is pushing back against recent Court decisions that encroach on Congress’s domain. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
John Elwood provides an unadorned roll of Monday’s relists. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:54 pm
Charnes got the ball rolling withThe text of the America Invents Act, the statutory history, the statute's policy goals, and this Court's decision in Cuozzo all confirm that Section 314(d) precludes judicial review of the director's time-barred determination under section 315(b).Justice Kavanaugh spoke of "shenanigans":Cuozzo had a part that, of course, responded to concerns that have been raised, I --I think in the dissent, and says we --our interpretation does not… [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 11:49 am
See also Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:23 pm
The legal (and music) world is abuzz in response to Chief Justice John Roberts citing Bob Dylan in his dissent in Sprint v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:13 am
Yesterday’s decision of the US Supreme Court in NFIB et al v Sebelius regarding the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”, aka Obamacare), which has convulsed the American political scene, usefully illustrates the important differences between the US Court and its UK equivalent. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:09 pm
In a case of first impression in the Second Circuit regarding 18 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:47 am
The case of Petty v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:09 am
In Thom v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
Following the decision in Forcelux v Binnie the adjourned hearings were not a trial and so the Bank were in effect seeking a summary judgement for possession. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:14 pm
See Brinkley v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:51 pm
In Fuszek v. [read post]
