Search for: "STATE v HOLMES" Results 801 - 820 of 1,545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am by Ben
However, recordings released before 1972 are protected by state-level rather than federal copyright law, so digital services argued that that royalty obligation didn't apply to pre-1972 tracks. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:56 am by NL
This was a matter of substance which, in accordance with the guidance in Holmes-Moorhouse at paragraphs 49 to 51, the reviewing officer should have taken into account. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 2:48 am by Scott Bomboy
United States, a majority of the Court upheld the act, but Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes dissented, with Justice Louis Brandeis agreeing with Holmes. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/288609.opn.doc.pdf State v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Gorsuch cites Brandeis in New State Ice, Holmes in Lochner, and makes a terrible Herbert Spencer pun. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 7:14 am
In 1927 the United States Supreme Court decided Robins Dry Dock and Repair Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 10:52 am by ernst
 It's now out in print, from the Cambridge University Press: Mark V. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm by Giles Peaker
The problem here was the high threshold of evidence set out in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 218 (Admin), reported at [2014] ICR 498, R (Tabbakh) v Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 827, and the second Unison case, R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor (No. 2) [2014] EWHC 4198 (Admin). [read post]