Search for: "State of Michigan Judicial Court" Results 801 - 820 of 2,288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
To be sure, Judge Neff never states that the claims here were collusive; while she refers to the risk of collusive claims, she carefully notes (in a footnote) that “the Court’s discussion of incentives for collusion … are presented only to distinguish policy concerns that arise, and are not meant to imply that the parties have engaged in any collusive activity. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:05 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
We talked about 3 of the 5 Hearing Officers before whom I appear in the Metro-Detroit Branch of the Michigan Secretary of State's Driver Assessment and Appeal Division (DAAD) in Livonia. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:01 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
"The court today embraces the sporting chance theory of criminal law, in which the state functions like a conscientious casino operator, giving each player a fair chance to beat the house, that is, serve less time than the law says he deserves. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:01 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
"The court today embraces the sporting chance theory of criminal law, in which the state functions like a conscientious casino operator, giving each player a fair chance to beat the house, that is, serve less time than the law says he deserves. [read post]
Requiring the court to ignore these separation of powers risks until (if ever) a party comes forward with standing to challenge B-Z would, as the NFIB dissenters noted, “be particularly destructive of sound government” and generate uncertainty as to the enforceable state of the law. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:56 am by Joseph A. Ranney
When railroads first appeared in the 1830s, many states and municipalities, including the states of Illinois and Michigan, built their own railroads or gave generous subsidies to private builders. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:28 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
("In most cases, comity and respect for federalism compel [this Court] to defer to the decisions of state courts on issues of state law"—a practice that "reflects [the Court's] understanding that the decisions of state courts are definitive pronouncements of the will of the States as sovereigns. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
Michigan Academy of Family Physicians, 476 U.S. 667, 670 (1986), and because, since our precedent in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Suffer No Tyranny How State-Tribal Relations Might Evolve in the Light of the Supreme Court’s Michigan v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 5:42 am by Larry Bache
Michigan Fire and Marine Insurance Company.2 The Supreme Court of Michigan affirmed a trial court’s decision to permit an appraisal proceeding despite the carrier’s denial of liability, stating: “[t]he judge also expressed his opinion that if there was an appraisal the parties might adjust their differences and end the litigation. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:51 am by Peter J. Dugan
  The district court dismissed the EEOC’s and Perich’s claims by applying the ministerial exception, a doctrine that was judicially developed by the lower courts and which exempts religious institutions from certain wrongful termination lawsuits. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
Louisiana - Court overrules Michigan v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:48 am by Steve Lubet
We choose not to endorse any particular plan here, so long as terms are sufficiently long to maintain judicial independence. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
Morgan filed a petition for judicial review of ATF's final denial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
"ICYMI: "11 Top Constitutional Law Experts React to White House Stephen Miller’s Rejection of 'Judicial Supremacy'” on Just Security; the University of Michigan Law School’s Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse has released all available documents in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:08 am by Tammy Binford
Hodges struck down prohibitions on gay marriage in states covered by the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals—Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 1:02 pm by Bill Raftery
Maine will not shift traffic infractions from the courts to the executive branch Ohio moves to consolidate all court fees/costs references and cross-references for easier access Changes to judicial/court employee retirement plans advance in Alabama, California, Louisiana, and North Carolina Multiple Louisiana bills ask state’s Supreme Court to examine state courts’ caseloads and workloads, jurisdictions, and… [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Bollinger (a 2003 case involving the University of Michigan’s undergraduate admissions process), the Court struck down the use of race even though government didn’t make use of any formal quota, because the university was nonetheless using race in a way that was too mechanical and rigidly quantifiable. [read post]