Search for: "Tuning v. Tuning" Results 801 - 820 of 4,682
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2020, 4:41 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
But if you do choose to pre-record yourself nodding and sipping coffee, spend your free time listening to Marlene’s summary of the recent copyright litigation of Thomson Reuters v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 1:23 pm by Christopher G. Hill
  The case that I will be discussing in this post is Royal Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:58 am by Liz Dunshee
One member pointed out that this is a revival of the old 1980s Skadden v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:33 pm by Bob Ambrogi
” Stay tuned for further developments, as this litigation is just getting started. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 1:18 pm
  So even if the defendant fails to make, say, the $20,000 settlement amount as promised, that only harms the plaintiff to the tune of $20,000 and change; anything above that -- in particular, the $50,000 stipulated judgment -- is an unenforceable "penalty. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 9:45 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The district court’s opinionsuggests that the broader concept of tuning is an abstractidea, J.A. 16–17, and the same question may be raisedabout the broad concept of positioning. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
Rosner and his frequent co-author, Gerald Markowitz, organized a group of sycophantic, lawsuit industry acolytes – both lawsuit industry consultants and lawyer – to write endorsements in a special issue in the Journal of Public Health Policy.[2] The ToxicDocs project has received a warm embrace from Rosner’s fellow travellers,[3] and perhaps more disturbing, funding, to the tune of almost half a million dollars, from the National Science Foundation.[4] The Abstract for the… [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:09 pm by CAFE
Code § 1315, Law enforcement authority of Secretary of Homeland Security for protection of public property Bivens v. [read post]