Search for: "Does 1 to 10" Results 8181 - 8200 of 42,994
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2008, 2:37 am
Doe, the Court considered the lack of personal appearences in the statute was a notable part of finding the statute was regulatory. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, noted the court, the action by an inmate need not to be intentionally directed at the correction officer nor does need to be volitional or disobedient in a manner that proximately causes the officer's injury, but must be more than "a benign chore routinely performed in penal institutions by inmates. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 10:54 am by Eleonora Rosati
In particular, and inter alia, this CEIPI Opinion highlights that:(1) Given the uncertainties that researchers face in applying present exceptions and limitations to Text and Data Mining (TDM), a new mandatory exception might drive innovation and bridge the gap with other jurisdictions. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:06 pm by WSLL
We conclude thatAppellant’s claims are barred by the doctrine of res judicata.Issues: Appellant presents the following issues: 1. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
**In her complaint McLaughlin did not allege that Local 2431’s conduct was arbitrary, discriminatory, or that its decision was made in bad faith, and, said the court, the record does not support such a conclusion. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 3:31 am
The Board upheld a refusal to register the design mark shown below, for jewelry and for "Clothing, namely, t-shirts, socks, hoodies" on the ground that under Sections 1, 2 and 45 of the Trademark Act, the proposed mark, as used on the specimens of record, is merely a decorative or ornamental feature of the goods and does not function as a trademark to indicate their source. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, noted the court, the action by an inmate need not to be intentionally directed at the correction officer nor does need to be volitional or disobedient in a manner that proximately causes the officer's injury, but must be more than "a benign chore routinely performed in penal institutions by inmates. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 11:28 am
The decision comes out the way it does because it makes sense. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:17 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Document D9, taken as closest prior art, does not disclose the features of the characterising portion. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am by MBettman
On September 28, 2012, the trial court sentenced Blankenship to five years of community control and classified him as a Tier II Sex Offender pursuant to R.C. 2950.01(F)(1)(b). [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 6:34 am
  I've asked them what does (and does not) make for a successful professor-RA relationship. [read post]