Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 8181 - 8200
of 10,141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2009, 6:24 pm
Video 3: Turner v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:01 pm
But first I should say that en route to that conclusion, Judge Hudson did get something important right: He rejected the federal government's argument that because the Act was challenged on its face, it had to be upheld unless, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:22 am
Every year in the United States (according to the Centers for Disease Control) 1.4 million people sustain a TBI with 50,000 deaths, 235,000 hospital admissions and 1.1 million treated and released from a hospital emergency room. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 10:42 pm
United States, 193 U.S. 197, 364 (1904). [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 12:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
See also United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule 28.3(b) (Citation Form; Certification) (Aug. 1, 2011) (“For each legal proposition supported by citations in the argument, counsel must cite to any opposing authority if such authority is binding on this court, e.g., U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
The answer was easy: “The United States must lead by the power of our example and not by the example of our power. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 8:13 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
It is wishful thinking, therefore, to argue, as Stewart Jackson (Peterborough) (Con) does, that: Is not it true that the recent case of Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom specifically allows the Government to proceed with a range of policy options, which, like the consultation in 2009, could be put out for public discussion? [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 8:15 am
United States, 506 U.S. 224, 232, 235-36 (1993). [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:39 pm
Supreme Court ruling [in Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
Read correctly, the framework established by Twombly and Iqbal is not inconsistent with (to quote S. 1504) "the standards set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Conley v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:02 pm
When the president of the United States recklessly calls such core principles into question, they warrant repeating. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:01 pm
Lehman Brothers’ failure resulted in the largest bankruptcy filing in United States history. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] This link also has a certain irony to it. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 7:14 am
United States, 529 U. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:45 am
Brunetti appealed this rejection to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which found this prohibition on immoral or scandalous marks to be in violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
-citizen parents outside of the United States also acquire citizenship at birth, subject to certain limits. [read post]
