Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 8221 - 8240 of 57,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2011, 3:51 pm by Lyle Denniston
The state court majority went on to rely upon the reasoning of the Supreme Court in the 2004 decision in the Yarborough v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
 She also adverted to Alice Corporation v CLS [noted on the IPKat here], to which the other speakers would later refer. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Ultimately Supreme Court directed that State Farm Insurance Company [State Farm], with which the Birnbaums had automobile and umbrella insurance policies, be joined.The Appellate Division said that the County, in support of motion, had submitted the consultant agreement. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Thus, said the court, ECSO was not required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 USC §12101 et seq.) or the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law §296) to accommodate her disability by creating such a light duty position for her.* See also County of Erie v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2014 NY Slip Op 07829, Appellate Division, Fourth Department** Executive Law §296(3)(b) requires employers to make reasonable accommodations… [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"Of critical importance, said the Appellate Division, is the principal that "a State Trooper holds a position of great sensitivity and trust . . . and [a] higher standard of fitness and character pertains to police officers than to ordinary civil servants. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:16 pm
Westchester County Probate Lawyers said the court said that under SCPA 502 (2)(a) states that "each respondent demanding a jury trial must do so in his answer or objections. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:39 pm
Even when the evidence adduced by the state in support of your commitment is somewhat lame. [read post]
25 May 2007, 3:28 pm
UPDATE: The D.C. government's motion for a stay indicates that an appeal to the Supreme Court would include these questions: "(1) whether the [Circuit Court] panel decision conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 4:10 am
Stress resulting from a lawful personnel action, including discipline, is not a compensable injury within the meaning of the Workers’ Compensation LawMatter of Witkowich v SUNY Alfred State Coll. of Ceramics, 2011 NY Slip Op 00454, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThree months after Kenneth Witkowich began serving as the Chief of University Police for Alfred State College he was terminated. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The claimant’s counsel, David Sherborne, said that this was insufficient since a breach of the assurance had no significant legal consequence (unlike a breach of an injunction, a breach of the assurance would not constitute a contempt of court) and referring to the approach of Mr Justice Dingemans in Weller v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2014] EWHC 2127 (QB). [read post]