Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 8261 - 8280
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2014, 10:05 pm
But I understand the advantage of using a flag; in addition to marking text as significant, you can (optionally) write notes on the flag, such as explaining why this testimony matters. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:25 pm
See Blawgletter, June 19, 2014, "You Still Can't Patent Ideas". [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:18 am
But at least as a political economy matter, it’s unclear if setting high wages in particular settings where the markets aren’t functioning well would be harder or easier than raising high rates generally. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:57 pm
by Mark I. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
Every detail matters to Roth. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 6:11 pm
The use of "sensibly" in Judge Hacon's judgements is itself becoming something of a trade mark. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:15 pm
In this respect, it’s significance remains a matter of contentious debate—one which we certainly don’t undertake to resolve here. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 7:12 am
If you haven't had a chance to look at Lex Machina before, this webinar might be a great place to start. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Summary judgment is appropriate where a plaintiff fails to establish that a prescribing physician’s decision to prescribe a particular medication would have changed had a different warning been givenId. at *16 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 11:44 pm
But the settlement still has a major problem: America`s public square simply doesn`t have the room to give equal space to all the faiths in the world. *** The implicit theory here is that religious equality gives each minority, no matter how small, a positive right to have its icons trotted out by Christians during their joyous – and harmless – observances. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
IV, § 28-92 (defining “sexual orientation” as “[t]he status of an individual as to his or her heterosexuality, homosexuality or bisexuality”). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 1:34 pm
Not just because LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® will be marking its tenth anniversary in a couple of months and intends to be a lot less discreet and dignified about it. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
(Bauman citations and quotation marks omitted).The defendants were not “at home” in Texas, the forum state. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:19 am
(Note to Mark Bennett: Whaddya think?) [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:01 am
Humor is not a defense, nor does it matter if the mark has an alternative meaning. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Margolis isn’t out of trouble yet. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
Kaplinsky and Mark J. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 11:30 am
Patent litigation-friendly [is that an oxymoron, wonders Merpel] blog PatLit features a post that explains why the decision in the matter T 0584/09 might have been unduly overlooked. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 10:54 am
This marks the first U.N. review of the United States' torture record since President Obama took office in 2009, and much is at stake. [read post]
