Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 8281 - 8300
of 8,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2019, 12:59 am
Francois Pochart, Thierry Lautier and Lionel MartinThe PACTE law of May 22nd[1] introduced new opposition proceedings against French patents before the French PTO. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The Fatal Flaws in the “Abortion Pill” Decision October 23, 2023 | Peter Grossi, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School By second-guessing FDA safety determinations, the Fifth Circuit challenges the Supreme Court to restore agency deference. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:07 am
In April Enrico Bonadio, Luke McDonagh and Francesco Chierichetti reported in this blog four decisions in Italian SEP-related litigations. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 2:47 pm
Peter Jaszi: (Responding to Gerhart's earlier invocation of "Napsterphobia," where TM owners irrationally fear loss of control/rights.) [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
v=NsJHqstPuNo UPDATE: Governor Branstad signed the bill into law. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:49 am
Peter Smith, I think that whether a judge accepts Solum’s theses has little immediate practical impact. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:03 am
Spend a little less time in restrictive conditions v. control; also have as many mistakes as control. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
Reynolds and Altria in Gelep v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:43 pm
Image via WikipediaMediation is often touted as the panacea for dispute resolution. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 5:32 am
Decker v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 12:17 pm
In Harper v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
Peter Wirth. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am
Describing his actions as part of a “fateful, even historic, mission,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has arrived in the United States in preparation for his address to Congress on Iran’s nuclear program, which is set for tomorrow. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm
[So no one got qualified (or absolute) immunity this week. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm
” “Most academic connections are developed along the lines of narrowly defined intellectual interests,” said James V. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 12:21 pm
1) Give district courts discretion to punish frivolous suit 2) Forcing patent holders to be more clear in their claims in Biosig v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
