Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 8281 - 8300
of 16,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
In federal court, the district judge concluded that presenting mental health evidence would have made a strong case for relief under Romero, but that AEDPA limited relief because the familiar two-part test of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
(United States v Desmond (1982) 670 Fed. 2nd 414, 420)How great to start off w/a nice hook, then cite Bryan Garner, and then finish strong with Judge Aldisert. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:43 am
In the 2014 case of Octane Fitness LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
Once such relevant Florida Supreme Court case is DMT v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 12:24 pm
State of Washington v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
State). [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 6:26 am
§ 42.8(b)(2), Petitioner states that the ’685 patent is the subject of several matters that may affect, or may be affected by a decision in this proceeding: Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:22 pm
In Zak v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:00 pm
State). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
In its recent decision in Waters v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:30 am
This, said the court, “provided adequate notice” explaining that as stated by the arbitrator, the fact that Petitioner "may not have received notice prior to [receiving a letter of concern] was based on her own [earlier] misstatements as to her publications.... [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:57 pm
(D.I. 535)Footnote 6 is relevant to Teva v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:30 am
My 2014 William Brennan lecture on NFIB v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has stated that “[t]he Charter does not confer a freestanding constitutional right to health care. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:52 pm
The case is Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:51 pm
The case is Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Alfonso Rodriguez v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
” In Jacobs v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:19 pm
In issuing this opinion, the state high court: (1) clarified that state courts should follow longstanding federal court guidance in Faragher v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:28 am
” Following the precedent of Lenz v. [read post]
