Search for: "Does 1-100"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 14,034
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
BTW, does he provide any examples? [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
It was held that it would seem somewhat absurd if making a minor amendment were to enable objections outside A 100 EPC 1973 to be raised which had no connection with the amendment itself (Case Law, 6th edition 2010, VII.D.4.2; see in particular decision T 301/87 [headnote 1, 3.6-8]).[6] In the present case, the feature “steady state” has not been added or amended during opposition proceedings but was already present in claim 1 as granted […]. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
It states that security to the amount of 100 million euros ($132 million) is required to prevent further enforcement of the injunction (further below you can see it's twice 50 million euros for technically two injunctions), an amount that is disproportionately high considering how blindingly obvious the invalidity of this patent is. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 6:55 am
CanLII's brief note on the study says, in part, "The study does not propose a firm target, a clear path or a definitive preference in favour of completeness or tailored approaches." [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
The Amended version of the Trade Mark Law will go into effect May 1, 2014. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
R 77(1) (rejection without invitation to remedy the deficiencies) applies only to non-compliance with the provisions of A 99(1) or R 76(2)(c).Therefore, even if there was a deficiency under R 76(2)(a) regarding the opponent’s identity (nationality and place of residence), this would not render the opposition inadmissible.The opponent also objected that the amendments did not comply with R 80 (according to which that the amendments have to be occasioned by a ground for… [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:53 am
For example, according to the final FDA 483 report, the owner was cited for six inspection observations: 1. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:41 am
Sept 1, 1752. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 4:20 pm
For example, according to the final FDA 483 report, the owner was cited for six inspection observations: 1. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 6:42 am
But it does mean you will have some leverage if things go wrong and it does mean you will at least have a chance. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 1:40 am
So most of the time the award will be between a low percentage of the claim and 100% of the claim. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm
(Does that make four strikes? [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:10 pm
DPHS’ estimates between 100 and 200 people might have been exposed to the illness. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
Outcome #1 — The Supreme Court affirms the Sixth Circuit, holding that IGRA does not authorize the State’s suit, and does not reach the immunity question. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
Outcome #1 — The Supreme Court affirms the Sixth Circuit, holding that IGRA does not authorize the State’s suit, and does not reach the immunity question. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Enlarged Board of Appeal decisions G 9/92 [12] and G 4/93 [1]). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:20 am
Even where the rules are in place, you won't find 100% compliance across an entire industry. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Because of this lack of legal security claim 1 does not comply with the requirement of clarity pursuant to A 84. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 12:18 pm
Or is it because a bicyclist is less likely to injure another person if the bicyclist does not make a proper stop? [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 10:07 am
The number of issued patents continues to increase as does the intensity of enforcement. [read post]
