Search for: "State v. Self" Results 8361 - 8380 of 14,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2022, 2:04 am by Giorgio Luceri
GuestKat Rose Hughes reported on the EPO's recent approach to the sequence listing ST. 25, which has been replaced by the new ST. 26 (which raised concerns from EPI - and EPO's response to it), and provided analysis and thoughts on this (see here and here).GuestKat Hayleigh Bosher reported on the UK government's publication of responses to the call for views on Standard Essential Patents (SEP) that took place between December 2021 and March 2022 (see here).GuestKat… [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Her claim denied  for workers' compensation benefits by the Board, Claimant then appealed the Board’s decision.The Appellate Division affirmed the Board’s ruling, citing Matter of Lozowski v Wiz, 134 AD3d 1177. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 7:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
As this case was dismissed under Rule 12 for failure to state a claim, the facts are straightforward. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 3:05 am by John A. Gallagher
"In contrast to other employment-related claims, recoveries made on claims relating to violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) may not be taxable income, at least in cases decided in the Federal District Court sitting in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.PENNSYLVANIA FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT SITTING IN PENNSYLVANIA DETERMINES THAT FMLA RECOVERIES ARE NOT TAXABLE AS W-2 INCOME Click Here to read how FMLA Leave and short-term disability benefits fit together.In a… [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 6:53 am by Josh Sturtevant
It seems incredible for so many reasons that I first published the reprinted post below over a year ago...The Dual Critical Role and Culpability of the Media in State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:12 am
The Board considered the six factors set forth in Converse, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Both Texas' own experience and the examples of other states show #2 was correct, and #3 has always to me seemed self-evident, the Legislative Budget Board's pro-enhancement posturing notwithstanding. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:06 am by John Jascob
The court ultimately concluded that the disappointing sales numbers and resulting stock price drop were more plausibly related to customer reaction to the company's public relations issues than its accounting practices (Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:26 am by WSLL
JUBIE, individually, Appellants (Defendants) v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Judges Dyk and Wallach stated that "post-invention evidence" is rightly not allowed in considering obviousness. [read post]