Search for: "United States v. Grant"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 25,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2010, 9:37 am
via CMS Cameron McKenna LLP Mitre House 160 Aldersgate Street London EC1A 4DD United Kingdom Case: Grisbrook v MGN Ltd and others [2010] EWCA Civ 139 Newspaper online archives are now further fertile ground for UK IP and copyright solicitors and barristers seeking plainitff driven photographic copyrght infringement claims. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 2:03 pm
More importantly, the Court found that the investigatory stop conducted by the officer in this case was proper under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which grants freedom from unreasonable searches, and Article I, Section 12, of the Florida Constitution, which adopts that amendment for state law purposes. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 10:57 am
In the United States, the State historically does not have a common law right to appeal a judgment in a criminal defendant’s favor. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 7:26 pm
” In “The Specter of Indian Removal: The Persistence of State Supremacy Arguments in Federal Indian Law,” 123 Columbia Law Review 1533 (2023), Allread takes Oklahoma v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:50 pm
Eliminating these bars would allow individuals who lived in the United States illegally to apply for admission in the future. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:32 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 11:20 am
The United States Supreme Court held in Missouri v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:58 am
The Fifth Circuit did no better in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 7:58 pm
Using Marbury v. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 8:27 am
An interesting decision was handed down recently by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York with respect to class action lawsuits involving wage claims under both Federal and State law.In Guzman v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
United States, 2017 WL 2704016 (7th Cir. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Metso Minerals Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:40 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:11 am
Facts: This case (Barakat v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 9:40 am
Facts: This case (Michael Rowan v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:38 am
Sheetz v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:57 am
Following a bench trial, the United States District Court for the District of Vermont ruled in plaintiffs' favor on the Atomic Energy Act preemption claim and the dormant Commerce Clause claim, and found that the Federal Power Act preemption claim was not ripe. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 3:49 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:30 am
§ 2000e et seq.,] and New York State's Human Right Law [Executive Law Article 15].The United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, found a triable issue of fact with respect to Zarda's contention that Altitude was in of violation of New York law but granted summary judgment to Altitude with respect to Zarda's Title VII claim. [read post]
