Search for: "Jones v. District Court" Results 821 - 840 of 3,115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2009, 10:48 am
Nonetheless, here's something to think about as the new week begins.You're on the district court. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Stephanie Swing
Supreme Court decision in Michigan Central Railroad Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 75171 (D NV, July 26, 2010), a Nevada federal district court held that prison authorities had adequately accommodated plaintiff's participation in the Ramadan fast by providing pre-dawn and post-sunset meals.In Jones v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
  The Court also denied cert. in Jones v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Dover District Council v CPRE Kent, heard 16 Oct 2017. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:14 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  The appellate court reversed the district court, which had granted summary judgment to Thurston County. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:14 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  The appellate court reversed the district court, which had granted summary judgment to Thurston County. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Reuters reports: A Detroit prosecutor has filed a petition in district court to stop a Florida fundamentalist Christian preacher, who recently caused riots in Afghanistan after he burned a Koran, from holding a rally outside a large Michigan mosque.Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said the threat of violence was too great to allow Terry Jones to hold the planned gathering on Friday near the Islamic Center of America — the largest U.S. mosque —… [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:04 am by SHG
   The Supreme Court denied cert in Jones v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:25 am by David M. Boertje
District Judge Cormac Carney explicitly ruled that California’s death penalty system was unconstitutional in Jones v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 1:15 pm by Beck, et al.
Jan. 5, 2010) (construing Bugosh dismissal as "clear indication that it intends for the Second RST to apply" even though the dismissal "was not accompanied by any rationale") (Jones, J.); Durkot v. [read post]