Search for: "STATE v. SAMPLE"
Results 821 - 840
of 4,543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2017, 2:08 pm
As a result, environmental permitting (NPDES, Title V, New Source Review) has become far more complex. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 8:27 am
State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 2:32 pm
Abbott Point of Care v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 8:30 am
Phillips v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:51 pm
Div. 2007) State v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 1:39 pm
At that time, oral arguments had recently been held in the case of Missouri v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 7:40 am
The amicus brief filed by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the National College for DUI defense in Bullcoming v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 4:15 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 12:22 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:32 am
This time it's the United States District Court for the District of Kansas ordering summary judgment for the United States on March 10, 2009 in an interpleader action styled Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v Carrie R. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 11:36 am
In 2020, in Bolger v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Where the proprietor of a trade mark supplies to its authorised distributors items bearing that mark, intended for demonstration to consumers in authorised retail outlets, and bottles bearing the mark from which small quantities can be taken for supply to consumers as free samples, those goods, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, are not put on the market within the meaning of Directive 89/104 and Regulation No 40/94 [= Case C-127/09 Coty Prestige Lancaster v Simex,… [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 5:30 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:33 am
State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:23 am
State v. [read post]
