Search for: "State v. True"
Results 8401 - 8420
of 21,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2013, 10:03 am
Crabtree v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
In Sutter v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
In Sutter v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 5:11 pm
The brief in Paracha v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:13 am
Sivit v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:19 am
Anchondo v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
Former employees alleged they were the target of selective prosecution in administrative disciplinary actionBey v New York City Civil Service Commission, Supreme Court, Justice Madden, 2001 NY Slip Op 30058(U), [not officially reported]New York City conducted an investigation to determine which employees were claiming tax-exempt status or were claiming an excessive number of exemptions. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
Addison Automatics, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
True, the judge is, but as a general matter the fact that a judge enforces a private right of action doesn't suffice to create state action. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
One witness, V, stated decedent "was incoherent of everything and did not know what was going on around him." [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:27 pm
The United States Supreme Court has ruled on two drug dog cases in the last few weeks: Florida v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:45 am
In City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 11:53 am
Allergan USA, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:49 am
Sometimes this is true, but not always. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:49 am
Netgear, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 4:00 am
Co., 88 NY2d 869, and [2] that the violation must be of the kind that "creates a substantial and specific danger to the public health or safety," citing Remba v Federation Empl. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, “Even assuming that this is true, certain differences between the two provisions — including that 'section 71 affords greater procedural protections and opportunities for reinstatement (Matter of Allen v Howe , 84 NY2d 665, 673 [1994])-— as well as practical differences in petitioner's position at the time he was notified pursuant to each section, dictate that the process provided failed to satisfy basic… [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 8:34 pm
Apple v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 1:34 pm
True, defendants had also advised the district court that the individual claim should be severed from the overtime portion of the case. [read post]
