Search for: "*doe, Matter of" Results 8501 - 8520 of 140,223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2009, 10:59 am
It does not matter if one spouse worked and one did not. [read post]
9 May 2007, 8:02 pm
Does the following amount to "sticking up"? [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 10:21 am by Eric Goldman
The user took the matter to court (pro se), where the lawsuit failed: Contract Breach. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 9:49 am by Ilya Somin
Even if the mandate does count as a tax, it still can't be justified under the Tax and Spending Clause because it does not pay the national debt, provide for the common defense, or promote the general welfare of the nation. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:46 pm
Answer: when the European Patent Office says it does". [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:40 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
No similar compliment can be paid to the schadenfreude brigades now calling for his head.One found a similar "defense" in the Glenn Poshard matter. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 5:40 pm
Right now, Reid-Feingold is the only viable proposal, and no it does not have to become law to end the Debacle. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:28 am by The Docket Navigator
[T]he clear line of Supreme Court precedent and accompanying lower court authorities . . . establishes that purification of a product of nature, without more, cannot transform it into patentable subject matter. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 6:04 am by Eleonora Rosati
De minims exclusionsTo fall within the application of Article 17, an information society service provider (ISSP) must inter alia “store and give access to a large amount of copyright-protected works or other protected subject matter uploaded by its users” (emphasis added).Like the original Commission’s Proposal, the Directive does not define the notion of ‘large amount’. [read post]
4 May 2018, 11:24 am
Takeaway: The argument that an Alice rejection failed to follow a USPTO requirement to identify abstract ideas by way of comparison to concepts already found by the courts to be abstract is not a successful argument before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, because the case law on which Office guidance is based does not place the same requirements on examiners as the guidance does. [read post]
4 May 2018, 11:24 am
Takeaway: The argument that an Alice rejection failed to follow a USPTO requirement to identify abstract ideas by way of comparison to concepts already found by the courts to be abstract is not a successful argument before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, because the case law on which Office guidance is based does not place the same requirements on examiners as the guidance does. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 11:19 am by Eugene Volokh
[The Doe plaintiffs] also argue that anonymity is warranted for privacy reasons, stating that "[t]his case involves matters of the utmost intimacy, a person's religious belief or lack of belief. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 11:17 am by Matt Johnston
Does it matter how you define it when the number is around 15 percent? [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 4:32 am by David Oxenford
The FCC’s November 21 session may look at some of these issues so that the FCC, when it next reviews the ownership rules, can make an independent assessment as the expert agency on communications matters of the impact that digital has had on radio and television. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 6:45 am
The sad fact of the matter is that her previous comments would imply she’s aware of all three side effects. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:49 pm by Stu Ellis
  But no matter how tight the corn supply is, there does not seem to have been an increase in wheat feeding in the past couple years, and that casts doubt on the future as well. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 2:38 pm by Robert Chesney
Does this signify a change in administration policy with respect to the scope of authority it claims to possess under the 2001 AUMF? [read post]