Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 8501 - 8520 of 15,450
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2015, 4:30 am by Graham Smith
It is that section which does what Mr Ryder called in argument the “heavy lifting”. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  An FDA warning letter does not create a false claim under that (or, we’d like to think any) state’s statute. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:07 pm
  The court viewed this attempt as “an end-run around 23(b)(3)’s predominance requirement. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 11:50 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The court also says that the statute does not allow the listener to determine what is objectionable (and does not pose a heckler’s veto problem). [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 7:45 am by Gritsforbreakfast
It went into effect Jan. 1.In June, Lehmberg and Escamilla requested 17 new staffers to deal with the act, and the commissioners approved eight. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The children are members of the Gila River Indian Community (“Tribe”).1 On appeal, Mother does not contest that the statutory grounds for severance were proven, that there was a substantial likelihood that she would not be capable in the near future of exercising proper and effective parental care and control, and that severance of the relationship was in the best interests of the children. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:59 am by SHG
After a thorough review, the evidence before me does not satisfy this threshold, and therefore, you are not responsible for the aforementioned charged violations. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 7:53 am
This traditional doctrine arose the Industrial Property Statute of 1929 (EPI) and continued to apply under the Spanish Trade Mark Act 1988 (as evidenced by Spanish Supreme Court rulings 470/1994, of 23 May 1994, 169/1995 of 6 March 1995 and 717, of 7 July 2006). [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
She put the note in a shoe box with other keepsakes, but later noticed the note was missing.On approximately August 1, Duenas went to [Moreno]'s new apartment and made dinner for him. [read post]
And, Maryland Code, Commercial Law §23-102 provides, as follows: (a)  If a conflict exists between the express terms and conditions of an operating agreement and the terms and condition [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 7:21 am
  Not to worry, the predominance requirement of Rule 23(b)(3) came to the rescue, as it so often does. [read post]