Search for: "L. Good"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 18,619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2015, 6:46 pm
L. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
But there is nothing inherently good about restricting competition. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:51 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:42 pm
The new CFRA regulations now clarify that the employer must have a “good faith, objective reason” to doubt the validity of the medical certification before requiring a second medical opinion. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 10:09 am
Examples of benefits include merchandise, meals, tickets to an event or other goods and services.4. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:35 am
L. 1. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:01 am
There was no evidence regarding the actual channels of trade, and so this factor was deemed neutral.And so the Board concluded that the differences in the goods outweighed any similarity between the marks, and it therefore reversed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment hereTTABlog note: Text Copyright John L. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm
Ct. 2675, 2695-96, 186 L. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm
Ct. 2675, 2695-96, 186 L. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:12 am
L. 687-738 (2014).... [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:24 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:57 am
Helmerich & Payne, Inc., 320 P.3d 1012, 1022 (Okla. 2012) (quoting Owen L. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:42 am
“[L]iability under the Lanham Act has been construed to extend beyond those who actually misrepresent goods or directly place such goods in commerce ... to any person who knowingly causes a false representation to be used in connection with goods and services in commerce. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 3:30 am
L. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:06 pm
Jewell, 42 U.S. 219, 233-34, 11 L. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:05 pm
So, of course, being a good tax scholar, you’re dying to know those exceptions. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:03 pm
L. 112 (2015) , with concluding remarksAs of the two-year anniversary of IPR and CBM proceedings, parties have filed over 2,000, surpassing even ambitious expectations for the program--and representing [p. 142] a sea change in patent law. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Matthew Sag has posted IP Litigation in United States District Courts: 1994 to 2014 (forthcoming Iowa L. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:17 am
They typically do nothing more than give the Board the opportunity to pound a few more nails into the coffin.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm
Jaykus L. (1997). [read post]
