Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 9,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
So far, both the district court and a Fifth Circuit panel have ruled against the state on that point. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
But in 1974, the Supreme Court held in Geduldig v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 8:11 am
While the Sundance court opined that terminating grievance proceedings constitutes an adverse employment action, the entire discussion was dicta, the judge first noted, arguing that Sundance did not control and thus that this was an issue of first impression. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:50 pm
The court of appeals will be interested in the same questions as the district court at first—why should we care? [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 3:04 pm
(The appellate court did not reach the district court’s ruling on materiality.) [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:07 am
The meeting was calendared, in February 2013, at the FDA as a follow up to the Supreme Court’s decision in Pliva v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:20 pm
Last year it became the first UK newspaper to win the Pulitzer Prize for the Edward Snowden revelations about US state surveillance. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, has ruled in Klayman v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
https://lnkd.in/gyxg6He2 Eleventh Circuit savages district court and class counsel for errors in service of getting some value out of now worthless claims. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
In Sheik, decided when Iowa had been a state for less than forty years, we first announced this rule. 64 Iowa at 147–48, 19 N.W. at 875–76. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 11:32 am
(D) The user’s name, address, and telephone number, and a statement that the user consents to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which the address is located, or if the user’s address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which the service provider may be found, and that the user will accept service of process from the person who provided notification to the… [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 11:32 am
(D) The user’s name, address, and telephone number, and a statement that the user consents to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which the address is located, or if the user’s address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which the service provider may be found, and that the user will accept service of process from the person who provided notification to the… [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 11:32 am
(D) The user’s name, address, and telephone number, and a statement that the user consents to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which the address is located, or if the user’s address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which the service provider may be found, and that the user will accept service of process from the person who provided notification to the… [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:46 am
However, the judicial pendulum has swung in the opposite direction, and in Gordon v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In 2003, in Grutter v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
In a related context, as the Supreme Court recognized in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT JOHN PORTER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
The judgment of the First District Court of Appeals is reversed. [read post]
