Search for: "Burden v. Burden" Results 8541 - 8560 of 31,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2015, 1:31 pm
            The case is Rosbeck v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:24 am by Michael Risch
Consider how powerful the Samsung emails about keeping up with the iPhone were in the Apple v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 6:11 pm by Lou M
Those defenses are a seniority system, a merit system, a pay system based on quantity or quality of output, or disparity based on any factor other than gender.In this case, EEOC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Supreme Court held that New York's prior gun laws were unconstitutional.The case is Antonyuk v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 9:55 am by Eric Segall
Her standard for abortion was whether the government was placing an "undue burden" in the way of women seeking abortions. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 7:15 am by John Jascob
The group said its members would bear the adverse consequences of striking the preemption provision, a result sought by the states of Montana and Massachusetts in their suit against the SEC (Lindeen v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:36 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
” This was reinforced recently by the 9th Circuit en banc in Garcia v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 8:08 am by Jennifer Laurin
Over at the Texas District and County Attorney's Association user forum, prosecutors have been chewing on whether they have a duty under either Brady v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:24 am by Florian Mueller
Compared to the FRAND rate-setting opinions by Judges Robart and Holderman, last week's Wi-LAN v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"[E]xemptions are to be narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" and, thus, the party opposing disclosure bears the burden of establishing that the requested information "fall[s] squarely within a statutory exemption. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals therefore rejects the more plaintiff-friendly "motivating factor" calculus that governs cases brought under Title VII.The case is Natofsky v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 9:17 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" In other words, we apply a balancing test: is it worth it to place a higher burden on the defendant in any particular case? [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:12 am
The Board considered the six factors set forth in Converse, Inc. v. [read post]