Search for: "I v. B"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 24,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2019, 5:01 am
TSWA, dissatisfied with the decision, appealed, relying on three grounds, as follows: (i) The use of the mark was of such a nature as to deceive the public as to its geographical origin, and was thus contrary to s 7(4)(b) of the Trade Marks Act ("TMA");(ii) The registration of the mark is contrary to s. 3 of the Geographical Indications Act (1999 Rev Ed.) [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:08 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:28 am
If the decision in Sonos, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:24 am
V. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 3:36 pm
AUTHOR: Otieno B. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 6:25 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York in Five Guys, Judge Jack B. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am
Evid. 702(b),(c). [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:10 am
After Gary Reibert was charged with “with the receipt and attempted receipt of child pornography (Count I) in violation of 18 U.S.Code § 2252A(a)(2) and (b)(1) and the accessing of a computer in interstate commerce with the intent to view child pornography (Count II) in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
Sibthorpe & Morris v LB Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 25 Champerty and maintenance are two common law doctrines relating to the funding of civil claims. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:25 pm
" The case cite is Viacom Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 9:46 am
See, Lane v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 11:22 am
I draw a rather different conclusion from these figures. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:35 am
The Panel in Family Watchdog LLC v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
§924(c)(3)(B), is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm
I would vary the order below to provide that the builder and the landlord are equally responsible.Comment While this case is interesting in itself on the issue of negligence and the apportionment of liability, it has concerns some questions, for instance for Case Check, that there may be a conflict with Drysdale v Hedges. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm
I would vary the order below to provide that the builder and the landlord are equally responsible.Comment While this case is interesting in itself on the issue of negligence and the apportionment of liability, it has concerns some questions, for instance for Case Check, that there may be a conflict with Drysdale v Hedges. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Such was the case in Mallon v Parness, 167 A.D.2d 614. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:39 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
8 May 2023, 7:10 am
Rebecca Curtin v, United Trademark Holdings, Inc., 2023 USPQ2d 535 (TTAB 2023) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
The case is entitled Grainger, P.L.C. v. [read post]
